March 23, 2008 by Jerome Baum
Tags: personal, technology, website, online, home page, jerome, baum, jerome baum, web, site, home, page, ssl, certificate authority, certificate, authority, ca, blog, jblog, http, https, contact information, contact, information, cv, curriculum vitae, curriculum, vitae, link, links, hyperlink
Posted in personal, technology | No Comments »
January 7, 2008 by Jerome Baum
Outlook Web Access has a very bad spam filter. Google Mail on the other hand has a brilliant spam filter.
Now, Gmail added a POP3 checking feature some time back, and I would have been more than happy to use it, but POP3 is not enabled on our Exchange server. So what to do? No IMAP either, only OWA is available.
I went out googling for an answer, and there are hundreds of dysfunctional proxies to POP-enable an OWA-enabled Exchange server. I could not find a single proxy which is functional. So I decided to take the proxy which is available from here (originally designed to be used on an iPhone) and made some corrections to the code.
The corrections I made included locking the proxy to only work with a particular Exchange server (don’t want to leave a proxy open for the world to use…) and fixing some bugs in the code. Then, I uploaded the tool to one of my VPSes and ran it in the background. After adding the account via POP3 in Google Mail, it works pretty fine and filters almost a all of my spam.
Only one thing to worry about now: the locking of the mail box when it gets too full, but that’s not a major issue.
While at it, I decided to write a notification tool which will notify me via SMS when there is new mail in my Gmail that has a certain label applied. SMS alerts are now very easy to arrange, just create an appropriate filter and I’m done.
If you are interested in the actual code, you are more than welcome to email me at gratemyl@gmail.com. I may also be able to provide some kind of hosting, but the SMS cost money per message and are cut off at 160 for now (a limit which is easily adjusted).

Tags: email, emails, exchange, filter, gmail, google, google mail, mail, mails, microsoft, microsoft exchange, microsoft outlook, outlook, outlook web access, owa, spam, spam email, spam emails, spam filter, spam filtering, spam mail, spam mail filter, spam mail filtering, spam mails, web access
Posted in personal, technology | No Comments »
January 6, 2008 by Jerome Baum
This post is part of the series on web application development. See this post for more information.
Next week’s topic: How are web applications developed? What languages and frameworks are used?
The new week is about to start, but let me first summarize the previous week. This week I looked at differences between web and desktop applications, and came up with the following key differences:
Key Difference #1
One major distinction between desktop and web applications is the location where data is stored. A desktop application typically stores its data on the computer on which it is running. A web application, on the other hand almost always stores its data on the server where it is hosted.
The principle of storing data on a central server makes data sharing easier. An example of a great data sharing tool is Google Groups. Anybody can create a new group where people can post messages in a forum-style manner. Sure, formatting text with Microsoft Word is far easier and the text (sometimes) ends up looking nicer, but sharing that content with the world is far more difficult.
Key Difference #2
The second major distinction between web and desktop applications is that web applications do not require installation and upgrades, at least not from the user’s point of view. Once they are upgraded on the server, the upgrade is automatically pushed to the client.
Because of this, the end-user is more inclined to use a web application and can be provided with constant updates, therefore using the most up-to-date release version of the software at all times.
Key Difference #3
The third major distinction between web and desktop applications and the final difference I will be looking at is the fact that web applications require the computer to be connected via some kind of network to the server on which the application is hosted. In addition, depending on the speed of the network connection, there may be lag/delays in the application.
Upcoming Week
This coming week, I will discuss methods used to develop web applications. This includes frameworks, building on existing applications and other ways of getting the job done, such as the use of design patterns.
While I previously compared web applications to desktop applications, I will not do this in the following week, but I may be comparing web applications to other web applications or frameworks at some point.

Tags: web applications, development, series, comparison, difference, word, google groups, google, microsoft, microsoft word, pastebin, notepad++, notepad-plus, firefox, javascript, windows, windows xp, xp, web application, outlook, office, microsoft outlook, gmail, google mail, installation, email, spam, imap, pop3, pop, smtp, exchange, microsoft exchange, web application development, differences, microsoft access, access, microsoft office, microsoft office access, mysql, microsoft sql server, sql server, databases, database, database systems, dbms, rdbms, web apps, application development, jupiter it, jupiter it scaffold, scaffold, jupiter, it, wysiwyg, vba, visual basic, visual basic for applications, beta, visual, visual editor, basic, developer, connectivity, network, connection, network connection, compared, technology, networking, lag, delays
Posted in series, technology | No Comments »
January 4, 2008 by Jerome Baum
This post is part of the series on web application development. See this post for more information.
The final comparison post this week on the series is here to take a look at database systems. But I am not talking about huge systems like MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server and the like – rather about smaller systems which are designed for less technical end-users. Something among the lines of Microsoft Access, again part of the Microsoft Office package, as well as Jupiter IT Scaffold, a less well-known piece of software.
Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access is a desktop database system. More specifically, it is an RDBMS (Relational DataBase Management System), so you can specify relations between different tables. It is easy to create tables, queries, forms and reports using wizards or using a visual editor and, where appropriate, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) interface. Macros and a programming language known as VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) are both available.
Jupiter IT Scaffold
This software is currently (Jan 4, 2007) in beta. Take a look here. Like with Microsoft Access, tables can be created using a visual editor. However, unlike Microsoft Access, Jupiter IT Scaffold does not have any visual interface for designing queries, forms or reports. Instead, Scaffold requires the database/application developer to program all of the front-end except for the basic table view.
Comparing the Two
Again, there are differences between the two pieces of software. These differences lie in the developer interface and end-user experience, and are as follows:
- Programming Experience
The developer using Scaffold requires more programming experience than the developer using Access. Only tables can be designed using a visual editor.
- Reaction Time
When an end-user performs an action in a Scaffold application, there is a delay. This isn’t the case with Access, since Access is a desktop application.
- Connectivity Requirements
This point connects with the previous one. A Scaffold application cannot be used without a network connection, while an Access application can be used without a network connection.
Key Difference #3
The third major distinction between web and desktop applications and the final difference I will be looking at is the fact that web applications require the computer to be connected via some kind of network to the server on which the application is hosted. In addition, depending on the speed of the network connection, there may be lag/delays in the application.

Tags: access, application development, basic, beta, compared, comparison, connection, connectivity, database, database systems, databases, dbms, delays, developer, difference, it, javascript, jupiter, jupiter it, jupiter it scaffold, lag, microsoft, microsoft access, microsoft office, microsoft office access, microsoft sql server, mysql, network, network connection, networking, office, rdbms, scaffold, series, sql server, technology, vba, visual, visual basic, visual basic for applications, visual editor, web application, web application development, web applications, web apps, wysiwyg
Posted in series, technology | No Comments »
January 2, 2008 by Jerome Baum
This post is part of the series on web application development. See this post for more information.
Last time I compared PHP Pastebin and Notepad++, two pieces of software for editing plain-text documents. I also mentioned Google Groups and Microsoft Word briefly.
This time, I want to look at Microsoft Office Outlook and Google Mail.
Microsoft Office Outlook
You should know what this is. Sold by Microsoft as part of the Microsoft Office package, Outlook is an advanced email client which supports IMAP, POP3, SMTP and Exchange next to a few other protocols. I will focus on the email-related features of Outlook and ignore the scheduling and other miscellaneous features.
Google Mail
Go to mail.google.com to see this live in action. You cannot download this software, as it is proprietary and hosted by Google for Google. However, you can sign up for an account and try it out, maybe you’ll even keep the account, I did (gratemyl@gmail.com – I never have to worry about spam, btw, kudos to Gmail). Again, I will focus on the email-related features and ignore chat functionality, tagging, etc. for now.
Comparing the Two
This time, we are talking about email applications used to send and receive email. This is a pretty simple task, but it is important to note some major distinctions between both pieces of software:
- Protocol Support
While Gmail is only capable of accessing the Google Mail servers, Outlook can connect to any server using several different protocols.
- Installation
Outlook comes as part of the Office package and can be installed on its own (without the other components in the package). However, Gmail doesn’t require any sort of installation at all.
- Maintenance
In addition to requiring no installation, Gmail can be automatically updated and upgraded for all users without requiring them to download anything (or to be technically correct, there is a download, but that is transparent to the user).
Key Difference #2
The second major distinction between web and desktop applications is that web applications do not require installation and upgrades, at least not from the user’s point of view. Once they are upgraded on the server, the upgrade is automatically pushed to the client.
Because of this, the end-user is more inclined to use a web application and can be provided with constant updates, therefore using the most up-to-date release version of the software at all times.

Tags: web applications, development, series, comparison, google, microsoft, web application, outlook, office, microsoft outlook, gmail, google mail, installation, email, spam, imap, pop3, pop, smtp, exchange, microsoft exchange, web application development, differences
Posted in series, technology | No Comments »
January 1, 2008 by Jerome Baum
Tags: 1st january, google, google logo, icon, january 1, logo, new year, new years eve, new years resolutions, resolutions, silvester
Posted in personal, technology | No Comments »
December 31, 2007 by Jerome Baum
This post is part of the series on web application development. See this post for more information.
The first two applications which I will compare this week are PHP Pastebin and Notepad++. Let’s take a closer look at the two applications:
PHP Pastebin
This is a web application available from here and you can see it in action here. What you do is paste some text/code into the textbox and submit it. It will then be available at a provided URL for the time period you chose, optionally with syntax highlighting. It’s a great tool for collaboration, especially when using instant messaging.
Notepad++
This one has got to be a desktop application – duh! It is available from here. To see it in action, you’ll have to download it. It’s pretty much the plain old notepad that comes with Windows XP, with lots of features added, such as syntax highlighting, tabs and macros.
Comparing the Two
As you will have noticed, both applications have a syntax highlighting feature. But a number of differences show up between them immediately:
- Macro Support
Notepad++ supports macros, Pastebin does not. How come? Web applications barely ever support macros, since they are far too difficult to implement in the browser (JavaScript is a keyword here, I will be taking a look at implementation details next week).
- Tabs
Notepad++ has tabbing features, Pastebin does not. It is more difficult to implement tabs in web applications than in desktop applications, but is it do-able? The answer: yes, but it is probably easier to use the integrated tabbing features in browsers like Firefox.
- Sharing Capabilities
Sharing a URL which points to a Pastebin document is easier than sharing a file saved with Notepad++. The reason lies in the nature of web applications, and is one of the key differences between web and desktop applications…
Key Difference #1
One major distinction between desktop and web applications is the location where data is stored. A desktop application typically stores its data on the computer on which it is running. A web application, on the other hand almost always stores its data on the server where it is hosted.
The principle of storing data on a central server makes data sharing easier. An example of a great data sharing tool is Google Groups. Anybody can create a new group where people can post messages in a forum-style manner. Sure, formatting text with Microsoft Word is far easier and the text (sometimes) ends up looking nicer, but sharing that content with the world is far more difficult.

Tags: comparison, development, difference, firefox, google, google groups, javascript, microsoft, microsoft word, notepad++, notepad-plus, pastebin, series, web applications, windows, windows xp, word, xp
Posted in series, technology | No Comments »
December 30, 2007 by Jerome Baum
This is the beginning of the first series on the blog, quite an exciting post. The series is called “web application development”. In this series I will be taking a look at the different factors involved in the development of web applications and the many development approaches which can be taken.
Specifically, I will be focusing on the following:
- What are web applications, and how are they different from classical (desktop) applications?
- How are web applications developed? What languages and frameworks are used?
- Picking a development environment is important, but how to make this choice?
- How does development methodology for web applications differ from the methodology used to create desktop applications? What do “DRY”, “design patterns” and “what, not how” really mean?
These four topics will be covered over a period of one month (four weeks, actually). Each week, I will introduce the next topic and start answering the question. Please, feel free to comment on any post, including any questions you may have or errors that you find.
EDIT: I created a page to contain links to all the posts in the series. You can find it here.

Tags: development, series, web applications
Posted in series, technology | 5 Comments »
December 30, 2007 by Jerome Baum
Posted in technology | 1 Comment »